Colorado Eastern Plains Wind Tour

Earlier this month TWW visited the Rush Creek Wind Farm in Eastern Colorado with legislative candidates from across the Front Range to see firsthand how one of the largest wind farms in Colorado operates and to learn about its economic impacts to the state and regional economy.  Rush Creek is owned and operated by Xcel Energy and is the second largest wind farm in Colorado.  The farm spans four counties – Elbert, Lincoln, Kit Carson, and Cheyenne – and generates 600 MW of electricity or the equivalent of 325,000 homes.

Rush Creek is a major economic driver in those counties with the farm driving an estimated 2,970 jobs and $570 million in output during the construction phase.  Now in full operation, Rush Creek drives over 180 full time jobs and $33 million in annual economic output.   Rush Creek is also expected to result in $180 million in lease payments and local property taxes over the life of the project. NREL has conducted an in-depth analysis of the economic impacts of the project.

 

TWW got an on the ground look at operations on the Rush Creek wind farm and how Xcel and its partners manage the 95,000 acre site.

 

TWW also spent time with Rep. Rod Bockenfeld, Lincoln County Commissioner Steve Burgess, and Elbert County Economic Development Director Marc Dettenrieder to learn more about the local economic impacts of renewable energy development in Eastern Colorado. 

Arizona Continues to Lead in Automated Vehicles

Last week, Arizona celebrated the grand opening of TuSimple’s Tucson, Arizona facility to mark the expansion of the company’s research, development and operations expansion in Arizona.

TuSimple, founded in San Diego in 2015, develops “the world’s most-advanced self-driving technologies specifically designed for heavy-duty trucks” with the aim to “develop self-driving trucking technology to make freight transportation safer, more efficient, and environmentally friendly.”

TuSimple has had a presence in Tucson since 2017. Of the company’s Tucson operation, Xiaodi Hou, Co-Founder and CEO of TuSimple, said that since coming to Arizona, the “team in Tucson has developed and strengthened industry-leading technology that has made significant progress in advancing safe and reliable autonomous trucking – including the world’s first commercial trucking runs on public roads with no driver onboard.”

The company’s technology employs strategically located terminals to connect shippers, carriers, and fleets to the TuSimple Autonomous Freight Network (AFN), creating a “network effect” in which increased numbers of terminals and mapped lanes improve the overall value of the autonomous trucking service network. In addition, every autonomous truck uses proprietary three-dimensional high-definition digital maps, which serve as a “digital pathway for the L4 self-driving trucks to follow and support nearly all aspects of TuSimple’s autonomous trucking system by statistically encoding predictive knowledge of the road environment that has been accumulated over time to ensure optimal safety and efficiency.”

TuSimple’s technology is designed to solve multiple problems, including road safety, truck driver shortages, fuel efficiency and carbon emissions, and operational costs. According to TuSimple, its systems “can potentially save users up to 40% on operating costs while addressing a current shortage of some 60,000 truck drivers expected to double over the next few years.”

According to an Arizona Commerce Authority press release, the growing Tucson campus “will host the company’s expanding workforce and multiple state-of-the-art labs dedicated to developing and testing advancements in electrical engineering, sensor development, and mechanical engineering. Among other expansions, the facility will also host a new training lab for Test Engineers.”

In his remarks at the celebration event, Governor Doug Ducey noted Arizona’s increasing dominance in the advanced automotive industry, saying, “Arizona is the automated vehicle capital of the world, and TuSimple helped drive this innovation to our state. This expansion brings hundreds of well-paying, high-tech jobs to Southern Arizona and demonstrates once again that Arizona is the best place in the world to develop and scale advanced mobility technology.”

TuSimple is already running autonomous freight in Arizona in collaboration with commercial partners, including UPS, the Postal Service, McLane Cos., freight carrier U.S. Xpress, and Penske Truck Leasing, and the company has plans to continue expanding its interstate trucking routes and partnerships. Its growing presence in Arizona and the city of Tucson has already created hundreds of high-paying tech jobs and contributed to establishing Arizona as a hub of innovation, and its expansion plans will continue to play an important role in solidifying Arizona’s national reputation in this sector.

New Battery Recycling Facility to Help Close Domestic Supply Gap

This week, Heritage Battery Recycling announced plans to construct a new lithium-ion battery recycling facility in Eloy, Arizona. Heritage Battery Recycling is an affiliate of Cirba Solutions, a comprehensive cross-chemistry battery management and materials processor and a leader in the industry for the past thirty years.

The Eloy facility complements Cirba Solutions’ existing facility in Mesa, and will process lithium-ion end-of-life batteries and battery manufacturing scrap as well as provide additional services including disassembly, sorting, warehousing, and diagnostic testing. The end products from the facility will then serve as raw material for new cathode and battery manufacturing and help to close the domestic materials supply gap needed to support the growth of the electric vehicles market and increased need for battery recycling services. 

Of the announcement, Sandra Watson, President and CEO of the Arizona Commerce Authority, said, "This new EV battery recycling facility bolsters Arizona’s vibrant battery and electric vehicle supply chain and furthers Arizona’s reputation as an epicenter for lithium batteries. The innovative facility will produce battery materials to support the continued growth of electric vehicle manufacturers across Arizona and the United States. Arizona continues to be a magnet for technology and advanced industries.”

“The lithium-ion battery market is expected to grow exponentially over the next several years, with a projected market size approaching $25 billion by 2028,” Cirba Solutions President and CEO David Klanecky says. “Federal incentives for the purchase of EVs, requirements for domestic EV battery manufacturing included in the Inflation Reduction Act and state requirements like California’s recent move to require all new vehicles sold in the state to be zero-emission by 2035, ensure that lithium-ion battery recycling will be critical for auto manufacturers to meet demand and have a sustainable future.”

Pinal County, where the new facility will be located, is a burgeoning hub for electric vehicle manufacturing with both Lucid Motors and Nikola Motors also located there. The addition of the Heritage Battery Recycling facility further positions Arizona to meet growing regional and national demands for electric vehicles, which rely on lithium ion batteries, in an environmentally responsible way.

The facility, which will occupy more than 75,000 square feet, is estimated to provide 110 jobs in Eloy once construction is complete. The company expects to be fully operational by mid-2023 and will process enough battery material to support 50,000 EVs annually.

A Voice for Rural America Podcast

 

A Voice for Rural America, the podcast from the Congressional Western Caucus hosted by Congressman Dan Newhouse (WA-04) discussed commonsense energy policies this month. To listen, click the player above.

Congressman Newhouse interviewed Congressman Chris Stewart (UT-02), Greg Todd, Director of Utah’s Office of Energy Development, and Heather Reams, President of Citizens for Responsible Energy Solutions, CRES.

The episode took place during the 6th annual National Clean Energy Week, September 26-30th.  Congressman Newhouse and his guests discussed the importance of balancing clean energy development while still growing the economy and creating jobs.   

Listen in for a great discussion on domestic mineral production, transmission, and the importance of domestically produced all of the above energy from renewables to hydrogen, nuclear, and new technological breakthroughs.  As well as how Utah is at the tip of the spear in deploying advanced energy solutions.

For the West to Expand Renewable Geothermal Energy, We Need Smarter Federal Land Regs

This piece first ran in the Idaho Statesman on September 23, 2022, and can be accessed here.

For the West to expand renewable geothermal energy, we need smarter federal land regs

By John Karakoulakis

Fossil fuels and emission-free energy sources are not enemies, as some of the loudest voices in the environmental debate want you to think. 

In fact, the science, technology and know-how of the fossil fuel industry is laying the groundwork for an economy that runs on reduced emissions energy. That was true more than a decade ago, when flexible natural gas turbines opened up the power grid to much larger volumes of electricity from wind and solar. 

Today, the same trend is playing out in a new arena – geothermal – which is a critically important source of future energy, investment and jobs for Idaho and other Western states. The key, however, is reforming the nation’s outdated permitting laws so that they encourage rather than stifle innovation. 

Enter Rep. Russ Fulcher and Sen. Jim Risch, who are working to end the unfair treatment of geothermal energy on federal lands. Compared to other energy sources, geothermal developers must wait an additional 10 months on average before they even know if they have a viable project. 

That’s a big reason why geothermal projects made up just 100 megawatts of the 2,890 megawatts of renewable energy projects approved on federal lands during 2021, according to the U.S. Bureau of Land Management. 

Fulcher, Risch and other conservative lawmakers have found further flaws in the federal permitting process, adding more red tape to geothermal permitting applications than even exist for oil and gas. 

As a result, these lawmakers are pushing a legislative fix that would create “parity” between geothermal permitting and oil and gas permitting at the BLM. “Federal regulations should not discourage geothermal exploration,” Fulcher said when the legislative fix was first proposed last year. The current process is “long and burdensome” and is blocking “new opportunities to harness this clean energy.” 

Their bill, H.R. 5350, the Enhancing Geothermal Production on Federal Lands Act, was brought up for a hearing in the House in July, and hopefully it will continue to move forward.

If this problem isn’t fixed, Western states could mostly miss out on huge breakthroughs in geothermal energy – breakthroughs that the oil and gas industry is deeply involved in. 

For example: An innovative startup called Transitional Energy is using oil and gas infrastructure and advanced heat-exchange technology to produce geothermal electricity in Nevada and Colorado. 

Unlike wind and solar, this geothermal technology is expected to produce baseload electric power that’s available around the clock.

Traditional geothermal power plants use very hot sources of underground water to produce steam, which drives a turbine and generates electricity. According to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, these plants require underground water sources with temperatures of at least 360 degrees Fahrenheit. 

With current technologies, there are relatively few places where geothermal wells can be economically drilled to reach these superheated underground water sources. But Transitional Energy has found a way around this problem. 

First: Instead of drilling new wells, Transitional Energy is harnessing geothermal heat from existing oil and gas wells, which produce hot, briny water as a byproduct. Temperatures inside these wells can reach above 200 degrees, but this promising source of geothermal heat has gone entirely unused.

And second: Transitional Energy’s technology uses a specially designed turbine that doesn’t require superheated water and steam to generate electricity. Instead, the turbine uses liquid refrigerant with a much lower boiling point than water. 

“We run the hot water from the oil and gas well through a heat exchanger, which flash boils the liquid refrigerant into a vapor,” said Salina Derichsweiler, CEO and co-founder of Transitional Energy. “That moving vapor turns the turbine, which generates electricity, just like steam would in a regular turbine, but at a lower temperature.” 

Transforming oil and gas infrastructure into renewable energy infrastructure? That’s something everyone can get behind – even federal bureaucrats.

John Karakoulakis is director of The Western Way, a conservative nonprofit that seeks pro-market solutions to environmental challenges.

Electricity consumers need relief, not stalling

This piece originally ran in the Arizona Capitol Times on September 8, 2022, and can be accessed here.

Limited government. Free enterprise. Choice and competition. These are bedrock values in Arizona.

But you might be surprised to learn that in one major area of life – the electricity that powers our homes and businesses – state law doesn’t reflect these values. That means electric bills are higher than they need to be, which is the last thing our state needs when U.S. inflation is surging to 40-year highs.

Here’s the good news – there is a growing movement to fix this problem so consumers in Arizona will benefit from more choice and competition. But the bad news is some state officials are dragging their feet in defense of the status quo.

For decades, the process for determining where, when, and how electricity is generated in Arizona has been tightly controlled by state regulators, along with the utilities themselves.

Working together in highly complex, difficult to follow legal proceedings, the regulators and utilities – which have monopoly status within their service territories – have determined which technologies should be used to generate our electricity and how much consumers should pay.

This top-down method for determining electricity sources and prices leaves very little room – if any – for market forces to shape the state’s power grid and how much we pay on our power bills.

Of course, some reforms over the years have loosened this grip. But the decision-making process is still a far cry from what most Arizonans expect and deserve. However, for the last four years, the Arizona Corporation Commission – the agency that regulates electricity sources and prices – has been looking at new rules to further reform this process in favor of greater transparency, choice and competition.

Proposed Integrated Resource Planning reform rules, which include all- source bidding and more transparency, were introduced as part of a larger energy modernization package. This larger package of energy reforms is no longer on the table, but the ACC still has the chance to enact the all-source bidding rules. Rather than simply trust the judgment of utility executives and members of the ACC staff, this proposal would open up the process to much needed outside scrutiny by requiring utilities and regulators to “show their work” and help the public compare the plans of utility companies with market trends across the broader electricity sector.

These “all-source bidding rules,” as they are now called, would shake things up in three major ways.

First, to prevent costly overbuilding, the ACC’s five-member commission would review and vote on the electricity demand forecast provided by a utility. The public would be able to examine the forecast and provide feedback to the ACC commissioners before their vote.

Next, the commissioners would review and vote on the utility’s Request for Proposals. In theory, an RFP is designed to find competing sources of electricity beyond the utility’s own power plants. These wholesale sources of electricity – such as wind farms, solar arrays or small-to-medium sized power plants that run on natural gas – can often be built and operated at a lower cost than utility-owned assets. An RFP can also identify energy efficiency measures to minimize electricity waste and higher costs.

In practice, it is possible for utilities to skew their RFPs to ignore some cost- effective power sources in favor of others that are more expensive. With more scrutiny from ACC commissioners and the public, however, the RFP process has a much better chance of serving the interests of consumers.

The all-source RFP will generate a true market response on the resources that could be utilized to meet energy demand, including everything from clean and renewable sources to nuclear to traditional sources of energy production.

Finally, once bids are submitted in response to an RFP, the all-source reform package would require the utility to develop an implementation plan. This plan would be subject to review and a third and final ACC vote – a further safeguard for electricity consumers.

These reforms are clear and simple, but unfortunately Commissioners Anna Tovar, Sandra Kennedy and Jim O’Connor have spent the past several months blocking their consideration by repeatedly pulling them from open meeting agendas. Finally, at the August 2022 open meeting, they voted in favor of freezing the item entirely until January 2023 when a new commission is seated, attempting to justify their vote in the interest of preserving staff time and resources.

But this delay was entirely unwarranted. Commissioners and stakeholders have already had months to review, consider, and weigh in on the stand- alone proposal, let alone years of review and consideration when the proposal was included in the commission’s Energy Rules package.

Chairwoman Márquez Peterson and Commissioner Justin Olson voted to move the item forward. If Commissioner O’Connor truly supported choice, competition and free-market energy solutions – as he says he does – he would have voted with them. Instead, he declined yet another opportunity to bring needed regulatory reform to Arizona consumers.

Arizona families and businesses need urgent relief from rising energy prices and every agency of state government – including the ACC – should be doing everything possible to provide it. Instead, they are putting it off for another day.

Doran Arik Miller is the Arizona director of The Western Way, a nonprofit that builds support for common sense, market-driven solutions to environmental challenges that support the economy and improve the environment.

Arizona to Receive $76.5 Million Grant for EV Charging Infrastructure

Over the next five years, Arizona is set to receive $76.5 million in federal dollars through the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) Formula Program to establish publicly accessible EV charging stations along Arizona’s designated alternative fuel corridors.  Current alternative fuel corridors in Arizona include the interstates; but additional corridors can be added in the future.

Arizona Department of Transportation is taking advantage of new federal funding sources and developing a long range plan to implement a statewide network of EV charging stations. 

Investments in EV charging infrastructure have the potential to improve clean transportation access, enable reliable access to affordable charging, increase parity in access and adoption and enhance energy resilience, among other improvements. 

ADOT will be seeking input from the public and a wide variety of agency and industry stakeholders during the preparation of the plan. Public outreach will include surveys and online and in-person public meetings. Since the initial plan will be high level, additional public input will occur after plan submission to work out the details of implementation.  

The initial plan will be submitted in August 2022 and will be updated annually as new alternative fuel corridors are added and charging stations identified.

Senator Romney Tours Utah’s All of the Above Energy Infrastructure

This month U.S. Senator Mitt Romney toured a variety of important Utah energy infrastructure sites highlighting the state’s leadership in the development of innovative domestic energy production and critical minerals.  

Stops from Senator Romney’s tour included Longroad Energy’s Milford Wind Project, the largest wind farm in Utah which has 97 turbines over 16,000 acres, the Align Renewable Natural Gas site in Milford, Rocky Mountain Power’s Blundell Geothermal Plant in Beaver County, and Rio Tinto’s Kennecott Copper mine in Bingham Canyon. 

“One of the great things about our state is that we are really a leader in the area of renewable energy,” said Senator Romney. “We happen to see in this valley behind us all sorts of examples of technology that is being applied to see if we can’t create renewable sources of energy that will help us have power here in Utah, but also around the country and potentially around the globe. We have wind power, we have power that’s coming from recycled animal waste, we also have geothermal.  And in each case we’re developing new advances, hopefully, that will be able to be adopted not just here but around the world.”

Utah’s domestic energy sources are a considerable economic driver for the state and especially rural communities.  TWW’s recently found that Utah’s rural renewables drive an estimated $5.3 billion in total economic output, have created 4,368 direct jobs,  paid $24.6 million in local property taxes, and $6.3 million in lease payments to farmers and ranchers. 

Senator Romney’s tour highlights the important role that the State of Utah can play in developing new energy technologies and mining critical minerals that will drive the world’s economy well into the future.

 

Smart Water Policy is Needed in the West

This piece by TWW’s Jaime Molera first ran in the Arizona Capitol Times on July 26, 2022 and can be accessed here.

Policies will ensure not having to choose between water and economic growth

Low water levels at Wahweap Bay at Lake Powell along the Upper Colorado River Basin are shown Wednesday, June 9, 2021, at the Utah and Arizona border at Wahweap, Ariz. Dwindling Colorado River supplies, as well as inadequate groundwater regulation in large parts of Arizona, have put the entire state in a tough position. (AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin)

Reading the headlines about water issues in Arizona can be disconcerting. Our state is now more than 20 years into an historic drought with conditions projected to worsen in the coming years.

We can no longer rely on the water resources that once seemed abundant. Dwindling Colorado River supplies coupled with inadequate groundwater regulation in large parts of Arizona have put the entire state in a tough position.

But this is not a reason to despair – or to panic. We don’t need to discourage growth or declare that Arizona is closed for business because of the water challenges we face.

Jaime A. Molera

Instead, we must do what we can individually and together as citizens to demand smart policies from our elected leaders to overcome water shortages and promote economic growth. Thankfully, it seems our leaders are starting to listen.

The state legislature recently approved a $1 billion investment in the state’s water infrastructure in overwhelmingly bipartisan fashion. The money will support a mix of initiatives to conserve water where possible and ensure the state can secure new sources of water as they become available. It’s a pragmatic plan, which Gov. Doug Ducey urged state lawmakers to pass at the beginning of this year’s legislative session.

“Arizonans are, by necessity, water experts,” Ducey said in a statement following the approval of the new billion-dollar water package. “We’re protecting our water supply, strengthening our conservation strategies and ensuring that our future remains bright.”

Arizona has a long history of strong water policy and innovation. This track record includes the Central Arizona Project system that brings water from the Colorado River to Arizona’s major population centers and the 1980 Groundwater Management Act.

These measures helped Arizona grow into the economic powerhouse it is today. But environmental conditions are changing, and we must respond to these challenging new conditions by actively managing our water resources to ensure water continues to be available for industrial, agricultural and municipal users in Arizona.

The recently passed bill is a good start. It sets aside money for critical augmentation projects that will help Arizona shore-up its supply for the long term, as well as $200 million for a dedicated water conservation fund to help Arizonans in the short term.

Noticeably lacking from the legislation were any protections for rural groundwater. Unfortunately, a bipartisan effort to allow rural communities to establish groundwater management areas has failed to pass for several years, and groundwater pumping in large parts of Arizona remains unchecked. That is particularly problematic, as Arizona relies on groundwater for 40% of its water supply and, as supplies from the Colorado River continue to decline due to ongoing drought conditions, that will continue to put groundwater resources under major strain.

Given all this, what will the next chapter of actively managing the state’s water resources look like? To get some answers, I spoke with one of our state leaders, Rep. Joanne Osborne, while the legislature was finalizing the landmark $1 billion water deal.

Representative Osborne says that the bulk of the funding should be set aside for long-term water supply solutions that include desalination technologies to convert salt water into drinking water and “a pipeline to our waterlogged states that have issues of flooding.” However, these high-profile, big-ticket solutions “are going to take some time” and so it’s imperative to also move forward with pragmatic measures to increase efficiency and reduce waste. For example, Osborne said officials could replace “old pipes” that leak water and expand efforts to “reuse and reclaim” as much water as possible from unconventional sources.

Overall, Osborne and Ducey are spot-on in recognizing that the key to future water policy is making sure new initiatives are consistent with Arizona’s “low-regulation, low-tax structure” that has drawn new businesses and new industries to the state.

Too often, environmental challenges are presented in all-or-nothing terms. But thanks to our leaders here in Arizona, our state isn’t falling into that trap. Overcoming big challenges requires both pragmatism and optimism. Because while we must protect our natural resources, we must also maintain a foundation for growth and prosperity.

 Jaime A. Molera is former Arizona state school superintendent, partner of Molera Alvarez, and the Arizona director for The Western Way, a nonprofit organization that builds support for market-driven solutions to environmental challenges.

A ‘Good-Roads Movement’ for the 21st Century

This pieces by TWW’s Greg Brophy first ran in The Colorado Sun on July 19, 2022 and can be accessed here.

If you’re a farmer, you love well-built and well-maintained roads. Without them, there’s virtually no way to get your crops or livestock to market, and therefore no way to make a living.

In fact, farmers played a pivotal role in the “good roads” movement of the late 1800s and early 1900s – a movement that spurred the creation of the modern road system we enjoy today.

A bad road “is a relentless tax assessor and a sure collector,” noted one farmer at the time. More recently, the U.S. Department of Agriculture has declared “well-maintained roads are indispensable to support the transport and economic competitiveness of agricultural goods.”

Today, however, rural America is facing a new infrastructure challenge that’s limiting our economic potential. This time, it isn’t roads – it’s a shortage of transmission lines that are capable of moving electricity produced in rural communities to homes and businesses in major metropolitan areas.

We need more of this infrastructure because electricity is a growing “cash crop” for many agricultural communities. Renewable energy projects – and especially wind farms – are already highly concentrated in rural areas like Colorado’s Eastern Plains. But that’s only part of the story.

Developers of other energy technologies, including small nuclear reactors, battery storage, hydrogen, carbon capture and advanced geothermal, are also looking to expand in rural America. Building in major metropolitan areas is too expensive and often at the mercy of anti-development, not-in-my-backyard political agendas.

But continued investment from the energy sector in rural communities only makes sense if electricity producers can get their goods to market — which is why new transportation infrastructure for electricity, in the form of new transmission lines, is so important.

Here in Colorado, a great local example is a planned transportation corridor for electricity generated on the Eastern Plains. The project is called Colorado’s Power Pathway and the value of the project is estimated at between $1.7 billion and $2 billion.

According to the project developer, Xcel Energy, eastern Colorado “is one of the nation’s best areas for wind and solar.” But without transmission lines to connect wind farms and solar arrays to large electricity markets, including communities along the I-25 corridor, these natural resources would be wasted. Landowners would have less income. There would be less tax revenue for local governments and rural school districts.

This is why we need to reduce the red tape and simplify the needlessly complex permitting process for building new transmission lines. Likewise, individuals and groups that oppose new transmission lines should, respectfully, rethink their opposition.

Here’s why I say that: Electricity is one of rural America’s fastest growing commodities. The only way producers can reach buyers is through transmission lines. In fact, you could say that transmission lines are a lot like roads for electricity.

In everyday life, as individual drivers, we only use a tiny fraction of the available roads. Most of the time, we stick to a handful of routes between work, school and the grocery store. But we also accept the need for a much larger, interconnected system of roads, so that other people can also travel freely, and so businesses have a way to ship their goods to stores or directly to consumers.

It’s the same with transmission lines. Even if they don’t run directly to your house or business, or even to your community, transmission lines are an essential part of a larger, interconnected power grid that supports our economy and our way of life.

And with every passing year, those transmission lines increasingly provide vital economic connections between rural communities that generate electricity and urban communities where so much electricity is consumed.

Just as farmers needed better roads in the early 20th century to get their goods to market, electricity producers in rural America need better transportation infrastructure in the 21st century.

If we can make that happen, it will mean more investment, more jobs and more revenue for essential services in farming and ranching communities – and a more stable, reliable and competitive energy market for everyone, no matter where they live.

Greg Brophy, of Wray, is a farmer and former state senator. He is the Colorado Director of The Western Way.

TWW In-Depth on Geothermal Energy's Potential

This piece first ran in The Gazette on July 10, 2022 and can be accessed here.

PERSPECTIVE: Colorado’s oil and gas goes green

By Greg Brophy

The energy transition that started more than a decade ago continues to accelerate as low- and zero-carbon fuels get cheaper and more reliable. 

But that doesn’t mean fossil fuels and emission-free energy are mutually exclusive. They are not enemies, as some of the loudest voices in the environmental debate want you to think.

In truth, the science, technology and know-how of the fossil fuel industry is laying the groundwork for an economy that runs on reduced emissions energy. That was true more than a decade ago, when flexible natural gas turbines started opening up the power grid to much larger volumes of electricity from wind farms and solar arrays. And it’s true today.

One of the best examples is happening right here in Colorado. An innovative startup called Transitional Energy is using oil and gas infrastructure and advanced heat-exchange technology to produce geothermal electricity.

The Denver-based company has already completed a successful pilot project in Nevada and will demonstrate the technology on a larger scale in the Silver State in partnership with the U.S. Department of Energy. The federal agency’s involvement follows an earlier grant from the Colorado Office of Economic Development and International Trade.

Meanwhile, United Power — a Brighton-based electric cooperative that serves more than 300,000 people in northern Colorado — will work with Transitional Energy to convert geothermal heat from oil and gas wells in the Denver-Julesburg Basin into a new local source of renewable electricity.

Breakthrough energy

However, unlike wind and solar, Transitional Energy’s geothermal technology is expected to produce “dispatchable baseload electric power” that’s available around the clock, according to United Power. 

This breakthrough could dramatically expand the availability of geothermal electricity, which is currently available in only a handful of states.

Traditional geothermal power plants use very hot sources of underground water to produce steam, which drives a turbine and generates electricity. According to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory in Golden, these plants require underground water sources with temperatures of at least 360 degrees Fahrenheit.

With current technologies, there are relatively few places where geothermal wells can be economically drilled to reach these superheated underground water sources. But Transitional Energy has found a way around this problem.

First: Instead of drilling new wells, Transitional Energy is harnessing geothermal heat from existing oil and gas wells, which produce hot, briny water as a byproduct. In Colorado, temperatures inside these wells can reach above 200 degrees. But this promising source of geothermal heat has gone entirely unused. With tens of thousands of producing oil and gas wells in Colorado, this is a potentially huge energy resource.

And second: Transitional Energy’s technology uses a specially designed turbine that doesn’t require superheated water and steam to generate electricity. Instead, the turbine uses liquid refrigerant with a much lower boiling point than water.

“We run the hot water from the oil and gas well through a heat exchanger, which flash boils the liquid refrigerant into a vapor,” Salina Derichsweiler, CEO and co-founder of Transitional Energy, said in an interview with The Western Way. “That moving vapor turns the turbine, which generates electricity, just like steam would in a regular turbine, but at a lower temperature.”

According to United Power, this technology will be piloted on producing and non-producing oil and gas wells. This is significant, because it may show that oil and gas wells that are no longer economical can be converted into wells that exclusively generate geothermal electricity.

“Utilizing clean, economical geothermal energy to provide local power that can be dispatched when needed is a critical component of our growing energy portfolio,” Dean Hubbuck, United Power’s Chief Energy Resources Officer, said when the partnership with Transitional Energy was first announced. “Geothermal energy represents a huge untapped renewable resource that can reduce our reliance on power from other traditional sources.”

Tied up in red tape

But to tap geothermal’s full potential, we need innovative policies to match these breakthrough technologies. Historically, geothermal has been caught up in the kind of red tape that wind and solar — and even oil and gas — don’t have to worry about.

For example, in a recent report to Congress, the U.S. Bureau of Land Management said permitting for new geothermal projects on federal land was limited because federal law requires geothermal applications to be handled differently.

“Unlike its ability to charge cost-recovery funding of project proponents for wind and solar proposals under … the Federal Land Policy and Management Act, the BLM’s geothermal program has no legal authority to charge cost-recovery funding of project proponents to cover the costs associated with environmental review and permitting work for geothermal energy proposals,” the report found.

“As such, the BLM currently relies entirely on appropriations to fund dedicated staff for geothermal leasing, permitting, and long-term compliance monitoring.”

In other words, while wind and solar developers can be asked to cover the costs of the staff time needed to process their permits — which saves taxpayer dollars — geothermal developers don’t have that option. Geothermal permits can only be funded with taxpayer funds, which effectively puts those projects on a slower and more unpredictable track.

No wonder, then, that geothermal projects made up 100 megawatts of the 2,890 megawatts — or less than 4% — of renewable energy projects approved on federal lands during 2021, according to BLM data. This is a bad deal for taxpayers and for geothermal developers and needs to be rectified.

But that’s not all. Republican lawmakers, led by Idaho U.S. Rep. Russ Fulcher and Idaho U.S. Sen. Jim Risch, have found further disparities in the federal permitting process that add more red tape to geothermal permitting applications on federal land than even exist for oil and gas.

The extra layer of environmental review means geothermal developers must wait an additional 10 months on average before they even know if they have a viable project. Just imagine how much harder that makes planning and estimating the cost of the equipment and skilled labor necessary to make these projects a reality.

An end run?

As a result, these lawmakers are pushing a legislative fix that would create “parity” between geothermal permitting and oil and gas permitting at the BLM. “Federal regulations should not discourage geothermal exploration,” Congressman Fulcher said when the legislative fix was first proposed last year. The current permitting process is “long and burdensome” and is standing in the way of “new opportunities to harness this clean energy.”

So much for those political stereotypes of conservative lawmakers only supporting fossil fuels.

Likewise, this year in in Colorado, Republican State Sen. Rob Woodward from Larimer County led a bipartisan effort to pass a bill that treats geothermal energy the same as solar energy in the planning and permitting process. 

When I talked to Woodward about the bill, he said his rationale was clear and simple: Wherever state law provides a benefit to solar energy, “let’s add the word geothermal next to it, to make sure that geothermal gets every benefit that solar energy does.”

Among other changes, the bill limits the fees that local and state governments can charge for approving the installation of a geothermal system — a common-sense guardrail that has certainly helped rooftop solar take off in Colorado.

Woodward’s bill also directs the Colorado Energy Office to develop a consumer education program for geothermal so that homeowners, businesses and school districts know they have other options for on-site renewables in addition to solar panels.

Energy for all seasons

To be clear, the geothermal technology used to heat and cool buildings is different than the geothermal technology being developed to generate electricity. Perhaps the biggest difference is the depth of the well.

Compared to a depth of thousands of feet for the oil and gas wells being tapped by Transitional Energy, geothermal wells for heating and cooling buildings only go “100 feet down, sometimes just 50 feet down,” Woodward said.

By harnessing the “fairly constant” temperature below the ground, geothermal wells can be connected to a heat pump that will “heat your home in the winter and cool your home in the summer,” he told me. “We need to let people know that you can literally put this in your house today.”

And the good news is, Woodward’s bill is now state law. It received a 33-2 vote in the Senate and a 58-7 vote in the House before it was signed by Gov. Jared Polis in early June. In a time when it’s harder than ever for Republicans and Democrats to work together, especially on energy issues, Sen. Woodward found a way.

Yes, our politics are polarized, but politics isn’t everything. When innovative technologies start transforming oil and gas infrastructure into renewable energy infrastructure, that’s something everyone can get behind.

Greg Brophy is a former state legislator from Colorado’s eastern plains and the Colorado director of The Western Way, a conservative nonprofit that seeks pro-market solutions to environmental challenges.

Why tellurium mining is the key to a low-carbon economy

This piece from TWW Visiting Fellow Simon Lomax first ran in the Deseret News on July 7th and can be accessed here.

Utah’s Kennecott copper mine produces one of Earth’s rarest metals — tellurium. Vital to low-carbon technologies, this mining project can help us reduce our carbon emissions

For more than a decade, the U.S. economy has been moving from high-carbon fuels to low- and zero-carbon fuels at an impressive rate. Overall U.S. carbon emissions have fallen almost 20% since their peak in 2007, as cleaner energy sources became cheaper and more reliable than the old mainstays of the power grid — especially coal.

But the next phase of the energy transition will be more challenging.

Just think about all the raw materials it will take to speed up the expansion of renewable power, energy storage, electric vehicles and many, many other low-carbon technologies. 

If we don’t have secure, affordable and reliable access to the building blocks of clean energy technologies, then we can’t have a clean energy economy. If that wasn’t obvious before the pandemic — which turned global supply chains for all kinds of basic goods upside down — it’s crystal clear now.

That’s why the addition of a new production line at the Kennecott copper mine, located 30 miles southwest of Salt Lake City, is a really big deal.

In early May, the mine’s owner, Rio Tinto, started producing tellurium, a critically important mineral for the manufacture of advanced thin-film solar panels.

Tellurium is one of the rarest of the Earth’s rare elements. It’s about eight times rarer than gold, and at this moment, global production of tellurium is dominated by China, according to the U.S. Geological Survey.

For this reason, Utah Gov. Spencer Cox says the addition of tellurium production at the Kennecott mine is a matter of national security. At the opening of the facility, Cox even compared this new tellurium production capability to the three squadrons of stealth fighter jets stationed at nearby Hill Air Force Base.  

“I think what we’re doing today is just as important as the F-35s at Hill Air Force Base for national security,” he said.

Rio Tinto projects the Kennecott mine will supply 20 tons of tellurium per year, or roughly 4% of global production, according to USGS estimates. After it’s refined by semiconductor manufacturer 5N Plus, the tellurium will be used by First Solar to produce finished solar panels in the industrial Midwest.

Headquartered in Tempe, Arizona, First Solar is about to open its third manufacturing plant in Ohio, which the company says is “the largest fully vertically integrated solar manufacturing complex outside China.”  

Without tellurium and other raw materials, however, those solar factories in Ohio would grind to a halt. Therefore, working with 5N Plus and First Solar “is an important step towards securing a North American supply chain of critical minerals to support the clean energy transition,” says Clayton Walker, chief operating officer of Rio Tinto Copper.

Producing tellurium at the Kennecott mine isn’t just about securing a domestic supply chain for clean energy technologies, however. It’s also the latest example of “full value mining,” an industry term that means finding ways to get different kinds of metals and other valuable materials out of the same mine.

While copper is the primary metal at the Kennecott mine, there are several others being produced there too, including gold, silver and — of course — tellurium. 

But until now, it wasn’t economical to remove the tellurium from the copper-bearing ores, because officials at the mine didn’t have a customer to buy and refine it. Now they do, thanks to recent growth and planned expansions in domestic solar manufacturing. 

Besides the economic upside, full value mining also has major environmental benefits. When more minerals are produced from the same mine, there’s less waste to manage and smaller surface impacts. Not only that, where mining waste already exists in tailings dams and other storage facilities, that waste can be reprocessed to unlock minerals that have become more valuable due to the energy transition. 

Just as important, adopting a full value approach to mining in the U.S. can reduce our imports of critical minerals, like tellurium, that are mostly produced overseas with fewer environmental safeguards than those we take for granted here in North America.

To be clear: Securing a domestic supply chain for critical minerals and clean energy technologies will not happen on its own.

After decades of discouraging investment in the U.S. mining sector, policymakers will have to find ways to encourage new and expanded production of copper, tellurium, lithium, cobalt, nickel and all the other essential ingredients for a carbon-neutral economy.

That won’t be easy, but it will be worth the effort. Just ask the Utah miners and Ohio solar workers who are already showing us the way.

Simon Lomax is a visiting fellow with The Western Way, a conservative nonprofit that seeks pro-market solutions to environmental challenges, and an editor-at-large with the Payne Institute for Public Policy at the Colorado School of Mines. He is a former climate reporter for Bloomberg News and a former congressional fellow with the American Political Science Association.

Western Hydrogen Hub Holds Promise for UT and the West

The piece originally ran in the Salt Lake Tribune on June 14, 2022 and can be accessed here:

https://www.sltrib.com/opinion/commentary/2022/06/14/steve-handy-western/

Steve Handy: Western hydrogen pact shows the energy transition is working for Utah

The same states that developed fossil fuels can now boost transition to low-carbon energy.

There’s never been a better time to live in a major energy-producing state like Utah. The world needs stable and affordable sources of energy and we can provide them.

That’s true for oil and natural gas, which Russian President Vladimir Putin is using as a geopolitical weapon in his war against Ukraine. But it’s also true for new energy sources and, thanks to market forces, those sources continue to get cheaper, cleaner and more widely used by consumers and businesses across our economy.

In fact, I believe the states that played a central role in developing fossil fuels over the decades will be just as important in the transition to low- and zero-carbon sources of energy – if not more important.

Case in point: Utah’s involvement in a multi-state partnership to spearhead clean hydrogen production in the United States. Called the Western Inter-State Hydrogen Hub, it brings together officials from Utah, Wyoming, Colorado and New Mexico.

Hydrogen is remarkably clean and flexible. It can provide on-site power generation for office towers, data centers and other large commercial buildings. It can fuel electric motors, especially in large vehicles like trucks, buses and locomotives, which don’t perform as well with heavy batteries.

Large engineering firms like General Electric and Siemens are also working on turbines that can burn hydrogen to generate large volumes of electricity in much the same way that natural gas-fired turbines support the power grid today.

The big difference, however, is that when hydrogen is used as a fuel source, there are no carbon emissions. The only “exhaust” is water vapor.

But the way we currently produce most hydrogen in the U.S. – from natural gas – does result in significant carbon emissions. Therefore, if we can capture and store those emissions, or produce hydrogen directly from water in a zero-carbon process called electrolysis, it will unlock a massive new source of clean energy.

That’s the purpose of the Western Inter-State Hydrogen Hub: To leverage the experience and infrastructure of four Western states across oil, gas, wind, solar and other energy sources to make large-scale clean hydrogen production a reality.

Utah is “the best place in the nation for energy development projects, including clean hydrogen,” said Gov. Spencer Cox when the clean hydrogen partnership was announced. By applying the “resources and expertise” in our state, “clean hydrogen is not just a possibility, it’s inevitable.”

Clean hydrogen research and demonstration projects have been taking place in this four-state region for some time. But the decision to pursue a formal partnership was prompted by the passage of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law.

The infrastructure law passed Congress with broad political support – including from Republican Utah Senator Mitt Romney – and it includes $8 billion in funding to support the creation of at least four clean hydrogen hubs around the country.

No siting decisions have been made, but the Western Inter-State Hydrogen Hub stands head and shoulders above the competition for two principal reasons.

First: Power companies, oil and gas firms and manufacturers in our region are already working on clean hydrogen infrastructure. Taxpayers will get the best return on their investment by working with leading states that have skin in the game.

Second: The energy economy of tomorrow won’t just magically appear. It will be a natural evolution of the energy economy we have today.

And today, more than 15 percent of the nation’s energy is produced in Utah, Wyoming, Colorado and New Mexico, even though we account for less than four percent of the nation’s population.

The infrastructure and workforce that supports our economy with a mix of fossil fuels and clean energy today can be repurposed to support 100 percent clean energy tomorrow. It’s just common sense.

There’s no better place to develop energy than in Utah and our neighboring states. It was true in the past, it’s true today – and it will be true in our clean energy future.

TWW Partners with Gary R. Herbert Institute for Public Policy

TWW, along with the Utah Valley Chamber of Commerce and CRES, partnered with the Gary R. Herbert Institute for Public Policy at Utah Valley University for a panel discussion on How Market Forces are Driving a Change in Utah’s Energy Landscape on May 19th.

The event was moderated by former Utah Governor Gary Herbert and included a panel of energy policy experts. Rep. Steve Handy, Dist 16; Landon Stevens, Conservative Energy Network; and Steve Ryder, EVP/CFO of Clearway Energy Group.

The panel discussed the changing energy landscape in Utah and across the country as well as the impacts of different policies impacting the energy sector.

The event was covered by the Daily Herald.

AZ Utilities and Universities form New Carbon Neutral Economy Center

Four Arizona utilities and the state’s three public universities are forming a new coalition with the goal of attaining a carbon neutral economy in Arizona. Arizona Public Service, Salt River Project, Tucson Electric Power, and Southwest Gas, along with Arizona State University, the University of Arizona, and Northern Arizona University, will together play a crucial leadership role in helping Arizona move the state toward a robust carbon-neutral economy.

The coalition’s work will operate in a new ASU-based center called the Center for an Arizona Carbon-Neutral Economy, housed within the Julie Ann Wrigley Global Futures Laboratory on the ASU Tempe campus. The Center will begin its work by pursuing the creation of a regional clean hydrogen hub under the framework of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, which was signed late last year and establishes program guidance and funding to create regional clean hydrogen hubs across the country. In Arizona, a hub would include hydrogen producers, consumers, and a connected infrastructure.

A successful regional clean hydrogen hub will help address difficult-to-reduce carbon emissions as well as grow Arizona’s economy, attract new businesses, and create high-quality jobs. Once operational, a new hydrogen hub would also support a reliable and resilient electric grid, provide clean energy for the electric, transportation and industrial sectors, and create economic development opportunities.

Arizona’s universities are optimistic about what the coalition can accomplish, and are eager to work together to explore the most effective ways to develop a sustainable and thriving carbon neutral economy.

Arizona’s utilities are similarly enthusiastic. Of the coalition, APS CEO Jeff Guldner said,

“The need to address the causes and impacts of climate change has never been more important. By partnering with Arizona’s universities and peer utilities, this statewide hub will help advance hydrogen as a clean-energy solution with tremendous potential to accelerate decarbonization. It also will further Arizona’s reputation as a national leader in the clean energy transition while creating economic opportunities for our state and its people.”

Likewise, Laura Nelson, vice president of sustainability and public policy for Southwest Gas, said,

Southwest Gas is committed to helping our customers and the communities we serve achieve emissions reductions goals. Advancing hydrogen technology and increasing availability of hydrogen to the market is strategically important to achieving our clean energy goals. With existing infrastructure that can be used to transport this powerful clean fuel, Southwest Gas is excited to work with this coalition and stakeholders to lead efforts to bring a regional hydrogen hub to our state.”

Arizona is already making great strides toward greater deployment of clean and renewable energy resources and growing the clean economy. Further research, development, and deployment of hydrogen through the Center for a Carbon-Neutral Arizona has the potential to significantly reduce even further carbon-emissions while continuing to grow and strengthen Arizona’s economy.

TWW Supports Competitive Community Solar in Arizona

TWW’s Doran Miller submitted comments to the Arizona Corporation Commission today highlighting why it makes sense for the ACC to support and explore a docket on competitive community solar policies for Arizona.

Community solar presents an area of tremendous potential growth for solar energy by broadening the potential customer base to 100% of homes and businesses, thereby significantly expanding access to affordable clean energy for residential and commercial customers alike. However, this can only happen if “the right federal, state, and local policies can institute a supportive regulatory environment.”

TWW believes that creating competitive community solar policies will help unlock significant investment in Arizona as evidenced in a market analysis for the potential cumulative investment in the sector:

“According to a 2015 study by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), nearly 50 percent of households and businesses at that time were unable to host a PV system due to factors like not owning the building or insufficient roof space. NREL estimated that by opening the solar market to these customers via community solar programs, “shared solar could represent 32%–49% of the distributed PV market in 2020, thereby leading to growing cumulative PV deployment growth in 2015–2020 of 5.5–11.0 GW, and representing $8.2–$16.3 billion of cumulative investment.”

Read TWW’s full comments here: https://docket.images.azcc.gov/E000019275.pdf

Arizona Corporation Commission All Source Bidding Rules Make Sense for Consumers 

This piece originally ran in The Western Tribune on April 29, 2022 and can be accessed here.

Earlier this year, the Arizona Corporation Commission voted down, by a vote of 3-2, the energy rules package it had been considering for more than three years. The package would have required utilities to generate 100% of their energy from carbon-free sources by 2070, more robust energy efficiency standards, battery storage provisions, and critical updates to the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) and purchased power agreement processes. 

The Commission was heavily criticized for ending years of work, but what was largely missing from that criticism was any mention of what happened after the energy rules were voted down: Chairwoman Marquez Peterson brought forward a separate proposal to open a new docket, moving forward with rulemaking on the IRP reform provisions on their own. 

Looking on the bright side

This is good news for Arizona and provides a reason to be optimistic. While the carbon-free standards of the now-defunct energy rules package certainly garnered the most headlines, the IRP process reforms, and all-source RFP provisions contained therein, will significantly benefit ratepayers by ingraining transparency, competition, and market forces in the resource planning process. These are important protections for ratepayers and will lead to a more efficient and effective power delivery system for the state of Arizona

Additionally, it will create a more open energy market that gives clean and renewable energy sources — which are now more cost competitive than ever — a real chance to compete for a place in Arizona’s energy arena.  

Competition carves a path forward to carbon-free

Understandably, it’s easy for someone to overlook the IRP provisions in favor of the headline-grabbing carbon-free goals. When someone says 100% carbon-free by 2050, it’s easy to understand what that means (even without necessarily knowing where all that carbon-free energy will come from). The same cannot necessarily be said for the IRP reforms. After all, they are technical changes to process-related provisions in Arizona’s existing energy rules. But, if done correctly, these provisions have the potential to achieve the same clean energy outcomes that stakeholders involved in the energy rules hoped to achieve. 

How can that be? The answer is simple: by creating a multi-step Commission review process that includes truly competitive, all-source bidding as well as opportunities for meaningful stakeholder engagement and input, all of which are included in the new provisions. 

The problem with existing processes

The existing IRP process is focused on two things: how much energy we need (called the load forecast) and where that energy is going to come from (called the resource mix). 

Years ago, these determinations were made in Arizona as part of a utility’s rate case, and were often contentious. That is because utilities had every incentive to maximize the load forecast. The determination about which resources were needed to meet a utility’s energy demands, while once more straightforward, has similarly become increasingly fraught over the years. It was also incredibly difficult for stakeholders to track and engage on these issues, because rate cases tended to be long and complicated. But in 2010, the IRP process was stripped out of the rate case into its own proceeding, creating additional opportunities for oversight, monitoring over load forecast and resource mix as technologies changed, and better opportunities for stakeholders to engage. 

Likewise, the request for proposal (RFP) process, used to determine the resource mix, has also gone through some changes over the years. In fact, there was a time in Arizona that RFPs were not required at all, resulting in self-dealing on the part of utilities. To deal with that problem, the Corporation Commission created an RFP process that required independent monitoring to ensure bids were truly arms-length transactions. Since then, the RFP process has gone through a subsequent evolution, wherein the parameters of an RFP might only include certain resources (natural gas, for example) or are clearly written to apply to certain predetermined winners. As a result, the situation now is that resources that could meet the energy demands in an RFP — such as renewable energy technologies — might be excluded entirely from a bid. 

Out with the old, in with the new

The new IRP process has three distinct steps to deal with all of those issues to create a more modern process with a truly competitive energy market. 

First, the Commission will review and vote on the load forecast provided by a utility. This provides a far more robust process in terms of stakeholder participation and input, making it much more difficult for a utility to, for example, simply forecast exponential growth indefinitely, and Commissioners will need to agree on the load forecast before the process can continue. 

Once the load forecast has been agreed upon, a utility can move to the second step of the process which is to issue an RFP. That RFP must be reviewed and voted upon by the Commission before it goes out for bidding to ensure it’s truly all-source. This second review also builds in additional Commission and stakeholder oversight and engagement to ensure utilities are not trying to skew the playing field for any predetermined outcome. The all-source RFP will generate a true market response on the resources that could be utilized to meet energy demand, including everything from clean and renewable sources to nuclear to traditional sources of energy production. 

Unlike the current system, an all-source RFP will yield a snapshot of what is actually available and all relevant factors on the various resources. It can even provide information on resource diversity mix, including demand side options like installing thousands of smart thermostats as part of an overall bid to meet a utility’s needs. As clean and renewable energy technologies continue to evolve and become even more cost competitive, the all-source RFP process ensures that those resources are given an opportunity to compete. And, if they are truly the cheapest energy source — as evidence suggests — clean and renewable resources will represent a growing percentage of Arizona’s portfolio. 

Finally, once the bids come in, the utilities propose back to the Commission an action plan outlining the procurement steps. The Commission then reviews the proposal and casts a third and final vote.

With these updates to competitive all-source bidding, market forces will help create an inclusive and cost-competitive energy economy that, over time, can bring Arizona closer to meeting the same types of carbon-free goals for which stakeholders were advocating in the Commission’s original energy rules package. 

Doran Arik Miller is the Arizona Director of The Western Way, a nonprofit organization that builds support for commonsense market-driven solutions to environmental challenges that support the economy and improve the environment.

TWW Joins Heidi Ganahl in Tour of Eastern CO

TWW’s Greg Brophy joined Colorado Gubernatorial candidate Heidi Ganahl on a tour in Eastern Colorado this week. The tour included stops at the Quail Ridge Dairy and Northeastern Junior College’s Applied Technology Campus and focused on important issues impacting rural Colorado.

At Quail Ridge Dairy in Ft. Morgan, owners Chris and Mary Kraft gave an overview of their milking operations and the practices they employ to increase efficiency and use less resources.

“I learned a lot about the efficiency of a dairy farm,” Ganahl said. “Every aspect of the farm creates amazing results of importance for the people of Colorado. I’m also impressed with how much care and love there is for the animals.”

At NJC’s Applied Technology Campus, Ganahl toured the wind technician training facility, hearing from instructors and students on the importance of hands on training that students receive.

The tour also included a visit inside the program’s nacelle model which houses the gear box and generator in a wind turbine. The nacelle was built by students at NJC from donated parts and equipment to help with training.

The tour was covered by the Ft. Morgan Times and Sterling Journal Advocate.